Okay, fine, all right already.
Dec. 19th, 2002 09:18 amI give up. The movie's fine, okay? Leave me alone.
Actually, I did like it much more the second time. Pretty much 100% more. Knowing what to expect helps a lot.
Honestly, I'm not that much of a purist. I thought that most of the changes PJ made from the books in FOTR were great, and actually improved the story. I just disagree with some of the decisions he made this time.
I like it. Eventually, I'm sure I'll love it. Just have to see it some more. Tough job, but I think I'm the woman for it.
Actually, I did like it much more the second time. Pretty much 100% more. Knowing what to expect helps a lot.
Honestly, I'm not that much of a purist. I thought that most of the changes PJ made from the books in FOTR were great, and actually improved the story. I just disagree with some of the decisions he made this time.
I like it. Eventually, I'm sure I'll love it. Just have to see it some more. Tough job, but I think I'm the woman for it.
See now...
Date: 2002-12-19 07:09 am (UTC)By the by, did a fervent Orlando-lover of our mutual acquaintance think he was just dreamy? Hmmm?
no subject
Date: 2002-12-19 10:19 am (UTC)Am going again on Monday, and I think it might well grow on me, and that the process is partially an adjustment to one's 'vision' and expectations. Certainly FotR, which I saw as homework Monday just gone for the first time in nearly a year - haven't got the dvd yet - was a far better film than I remember it being the first time round.
But (with a few spoilers)
Faramir! Grrrrrr!!! And why on *earth* did they change the ent council?!? It's as if Jackson et al made the decision that the hobbits should drive the action, and be the main force of persuasion to war against Mordor, rather than having people/ents come to the sacrifice of their own accord. I am particularly annoyed by the treatment of Faramir, since here he is far less of a contrast to Boromir, far less reflective and sober in his judgements.
Quite a few other little bits which seemed changed gratuitously, and I did actually feel the length of this film: rather than sitting there thoroughly spellbound, I found myself dissecting it a bit more than I should have been, which means it wasn't quite as entrancing. But some bits were - wow. The relief of Helm's Deep, the taking of Isengard, and the opening sequence, actually: all stunning. Lots more to say, but unfair of me to say it here and clog up your journal :)
no subject
Date: 2002-12-19 03:36 pm (UTC)I also felt the length of this one, checking my watch about 2 hours in.
I like it. It's okay. And I want to see it again, if only to see if my opinion improves, and like you, I'll know what's coming.
no subject
Date: 2002-12-19 03:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2002-12-19 09:10 pm (UTC)For what it's worth, yesterday in DC I had a nice long conversation with a friend who might possibly love the LOTR as much as you do (though without the slash element thrown in. I think.).
He had the same problems with it that you did, and described to me in detail exactly why Jackson should be hurt for this. Though he is planning on seeing it a few more times before he makes up his mind.
Yay!
no subject
Date: 2002-12-20 12:41 pm (UTC)*nods*
That's pretty much how I feel.
I really liked almost everything else. I liked it *a lot*.
But the Faramir thing was just *such* a major thing, and since he's my favorite character...
I'm sure I'll be more reconciled to it the second time around. I'm trying to talk myself into a fanwank that makes sense out of his behavior.
*g*
no subject
Date: 2002-12-22 07:01 pm (UTC)And I wish you guys lived closer, too, but heck, I wish that most of the time!
no subject
Date: 2002-12-22 07:14 pm (UTC)And I completely agree about feeling the length of the movie and not being entranced. I checked my watch several times during the first viewing, which wasn't something I'd expected to be doing. That's something that got better during the next two viewings, though. Once I knew what to expect, I stopped dissecting quite as much and was able to just enjoy the really glorious parts for their own sake.
no subject
Date: 2002-12-22 07:30 pm (UTC)But Gimli's one of the things that bothered me less the second and third times. PJ didn't do right by him, but it's not as bad as it seemed the first time.
no subject
Date: 2002-12-22 07:36 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2002-12-22 07:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2002-12-22 07:59 pm (UTC)But I think I've finally convinced myself of a rationale for it all, so the next viewing should be much improved. *g*