Since my brain is otherwise mush...

[corilannam]

The great moral issue with which I am wrestling tonight:

Is LOTR RPS more or less pervy than actual Hobbit smut?

I know, it's a difficult question.

Comments

[rsadelle]

Considering that Hobbits look like little trolls, I think the lo-trips (term courtesy of Molly is less pervy.

[zortified.livejournal.com]

Obviously, it depends on the hobbits. Merry/Pippin smut is a beautiful and natural thing.

Sam/Frodo is perverted. Freakish. Mind-bogglingly weirdo.

Unlike Merry and Pippin. Or orc smut.

Is LOTR RPS more or less pervy than actual Hobbit smut?

[glasshouseslive.livejournal.com]

[personal preference alert!] - I'm not sure there can by anything more pervy than Hobbit smut - unless it's dwarf/elf smut ;-)

[marzilla.livejournal.com]

Aha, thus explaining the name of the lotrippers list. I like that. And the Hobbits are cute. But that's my problem with them. They're too cute *g*

[marzilla.livejournal.com]

I can deal with orcsmut. Merry/Pippin... well... But yeah, those Sam/Frodo people... man, talk about pervs. Sheesh.

Re: Is LOTR RPS more or less pervy than actual Hobbit smut?

[marzilla.livejournal.com]

I definitely agree with you there -- except that I love Dwarf/Elf smut. At least when it's Gimli and his Elf. *g* They get the only good fic these days, too.